Lou Piniella, the manager major league baseball players would least like to play for?
That’s correct if you believe the Sports Illustrated poll published last month. In the poll of 380 players conducted in May, the Chicago Cubs manager received 26 percent of the players’ vote, with White Sox manager Ozzie Guillen getting 21 percent and Tony La Russa of St. Louis finishing third with 10 percent.
Believable? You betcha.
And if I were any of the managers that finished in the top five (Joe Torre of the Los Angeles Dodgers and Eric Wedge of the Cleveland Indians included) I would wear the designation as a badge of honor.
In this age of equally greedy owners and players it’s easy to see how the manager of Chicago Cubs baseball could earn such an honor. And when I say, honor, I mean it.
Piniella possesses the same qualities as a manager as he did as a player. He approaches the game with respect, diligence and perhaps most of all, passion.
In another era, the kind of characteristics and traits that would be embraced and admired. Those are the qualities a dedicated professional would hope would rub off on him.
But that was then and this is definitely now. And for that, one-fourth of candy-assed major league players designate Piniella an honor better fitted to the parade of baseball managers who never lasted beyond the length of their contract, who’ve never advanced the game beyond their own ego and a trip to the bank.
If anything, the Sports Illustrated poll speaks more of the players than of any of the mangers on the list. Piniella, Guillen, La Russa and Torre all have World Series titles to their credit, and Wedge has taken his team to the post-season with a small market team.
Piniella obviously didn’t help his ranking when he told the Cubs’ biggest underachieving headcase, Milton Bradley, that he was closer to the crap one scrapes off the bottom of their shoe than he was to a major league player. This came after another pathetic Bradley at bat and the $30 million flop tried to up his batting average against a Gatorade machine.
If there was a sad ending to this story, it wasn’t that Piniella used profanity in chastising Bradley. It was the fact the Chicago Cubs manager later apologized.
So what we can gather from this little tale is that overpaid, under-performing players can act as childish as they like, disrespect the game at their bidding and expect no consequences for their actions.
I’ve disagreed with Piniella’s managerial style and decisions in the past. And will likely do so in future. But, if I’m acting like the south end of a horse going north, Piniella or anyone else has my blessing on pointing me in the right direction. And I won’t hold it against them.
But, like everything else that seems to enter the Cubs’ world, there’s a mixture of good and bad news. Giving the worse first, the Cubs meet the defending World Series champion Philadelphia Phillies, a team as solid from top to bottom as there is in the National League.
Injuries, inconsistent play and a general ineptitude at the plate has turned the race for a playoff spot into a daily trek on the treadmill. Sure, the Cubs have got their miles in, but at the end of the workout have essentially gone nowhere.
Or to put it more bluntly, a ho-hum 





Cubs Sit in No Lose Situation
With less than two months remaining in the 2009 season, Chicago Cubs baseball sits one game back in the Central Division standings and two games back in the hunt for the wild card slot.
Despite the Cubs themselves and the countless number of squandered opportunities this 2009 season has wrought.
So what happens if neither of these reachable goals are attained? How will this baseball season be judged? Is a second or third place finish in the Central Division good enough for a nation of winning starved fans?
The mainstream media has attached any number of adjectives to the next two weeks’ worth of games. Pivotal and critical are but two of the descriptors assigned to series involving Colorado, Philadelphia and Los Angeles. You can throw in games against Pittsburgh and San Diego if you care to be precise.
Given the nature of the Chicago Cubs season thus far, this team is as capable of running off 10 wins in the next 16 games as falling completely flat and desperately out of contention.
And in my opinion, neither would be that great of a surprise to Cubdom. It’s been that kind of a season.
Regardless of the outcome, the one thing the Cubs brass is certain - and counting on - is that Cubdom is a forgiving lot. From the top of the Chicago organization on down, Hendry and brass are banking on that even with a cadre of all-star caliber talent and its $134 million payroll the underachieving Cubs are safe from the wrath of outraged fans.
Sure, grumbling will ensue if the Cubs do manage to miss this year’s playoff. Which is extremely likely given the on-off switch the team can’t seem to find. Whatever happens, however, Chicago Cubs baseball will not become a healthcare reform townhall meeting.
The endless stream of Cub injuries has assured the organization of that. Talk about a built-in excuse. I can’t remember a season in recent or not-so-recent past that a Cubs team has been beset with as many players on the disabled list as this year’s club.
And the list may have a new face added, depending on the outcome of Carlos Zambrano’s MRI. With Zambrano, however, it’s difficult to say whether the problem exists from the neck on up or the shoulders on down.
Oddly enough, the player who’s health was considered the question mark before the season began has logged nearly as many innings as any of the starting pitchers. Rich Harden, he of the glass shoulder, has 104 innings pitched - not that many less than either Zambrano, Ted Lilly or Ryan Dempster.
One has to wonder how good Jason Marquis would have looked in a Cubs uniform this year. He’s on pace to pitch close to 200 innings this year and his two complete games is one more than the entire Chicago staff.
But if Hendry would have kept Marquis, along with Mark DeRosa, etc… whom would he have to blame? Himself?